Skip to main content

ENERGY THEFT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS TECHNICAL PAPER

Authored by: Thomas B. Smith

ABSTRACT
Electricity theft can be in the form of fraud (meter tampering), stealing (illegal connections), billing irregularities, and unpaid bills. Estimates of the extent of electricity theft in a sample of 102 countries for 1980 and 2000 are undertaken. The evidence shows that theft is increasing in most regions of the world. The financial impacts of theft are reduced income from the sale of electricity and the necessity to charge more to consumers. Electricity theft is closely related to governance indicators, with higher levels of theft in countries without effective accountability, political instability, low government effectiveness and high levels of corruption. Electricity theft can be reduced by applying technical solutions such as tamper-proof meters, managerial methods such as inspection and monitoring, and in some cases restructuring power systems ownership and regulation.

THE PROBLEM
An electric power system can never be 100% secure from theft. In many systems the amount of theft is small (1–2%) in terms of the electricity generated. But, the financial loss is high due to the large amount of electricity distributed. Nesbit (2000) noted that, ‘‘In the US, the consensus seems to be that theft costs between 0.5% and 3.5% of annual gross revenues in the US. That seems like a small amount—until you consider that US electricity revenues were in the $280 billion range in 1998.Therefor e, between $1 and $10 billion worth of electricity was stolen.’’ Some power systems may forfeit more than 15% of power generated to various types of theft. A Transparency International (1999) report explains the situation in Bangladesh.

Electricity theft is a complex phenomenon with many facets. In this article, electricity theft is defined and various types of theft are described. The international scope and trends of theft will be examined. How theft can become institutionalized as part of the political, economic and managerial culture of governance will be noted. Lastly, some methods of dealing with the problem of electricity theft are examined.

CONCLUSIONS
The evidence points to the increasing levels of power theft in many countries and the financial losses for some systems are so immense that the utility is in financial turmoil. Investment in improving the system and adding additional capacity cannot be undertaken, loans and payments cannot be met, and the consumer faces increased electricity charges. Even in efficient systems, theft losses can account for millions of dollars each year in lost revenue. Electricity theft in its various forms can be reduced and kept in check only by the strong and assertive action of power sector organizations.

The strategy and the action should be based upon a thorough understanding of the specific nature of the theft problem. A strong case can be made that each power system (including consumer’s attitudes and behavior) has its own unique qualities and only by knowing the system and the problem can effective solutions be designed and implemented. Since a high level of power theft is linked with corruption, the analysis cannot be confined to technical and managerial perspectives and needs to be multi-disciplinary in approach.

Theft as an activity in some systems is closely intertwined with governance and with the social, economic and political environment. Corruption and electricity theft thrives off each other. In an overall culture of corruption as a way of life, electricity theft can be reduced to moderate levels by technical/engineering methods. But it is an uphill battle to reduce the electricity theft rate drastically as long as extensive corruption continues. Reduction in power theft and keeping it within reasonable bounds is more likely to be successful in systems with a good governance culture. This is because the theft reduction mechanisms find a friendly environment for initiation and implementation.

As part of generating and sustaining good governance in communities, electric power systems have the opportunity to take the lead in promoting sound corporate governance. The technological innovations make this task easier should the managerial skills and desire exist. Electric power systems can be restructured to make power sector organizations operate in competitive environments where efficiency and effectiveness in service delivery are both virtues and necessities.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PARTS OF A POWER TRANSFORMER

What are the name of the basic parts of a Power Transformer? We can not deny the fact that only a handful of electrical engineering students are presently familiar with power transformers especially on what it looks like. Unlike a transformer we found in our homes, a power transformer’s appearance and construction is somewhat more complicated. It is not just a simple winding with a primary and secondary terminal although basically any transformer has one. The function that a power transformer plays in an electrical system is very important that an electric utility can not afford to loss it during its operation. Our discussion here will focus more on the basic parts and functions of a power transformer that are usually tangible whenever you go to a substation . Although not all power transformers are identical, nonetheless they all have the following listed parts in which the way of construction may differ.

ELECTRIC MOTOR FRAME SIZE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

ELECTRIC MOTOR FRAME SIZE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS How is electric motor frame size being specified? Motor frame dimensions have been standardized with a uniform frame size numbering system. This system was developed by NEMA and specific frame sizes have been assigned to standard motor ratings based on enclosure, horsepower and speed. The current standardized frames for integral horsepower induction motors ranges from 143T to 445T. These standards cover most motors in the range of one through two hundred horsepower. Typical example of where you can locate the frame is shown in Fig 1.2.D – Frame No. The numbers used to designate frame sizes have specific meanings based on the physical size of the motor. Some digits are related to the motor shaft height and the remaining digit or digits relate to the length of the motor. The rerate, or frame size reduction programs were brought about by advancements in motor technology relating mainly to higher temperature ratings of insulating mate...

ELECTRIC MOTOR NAMEPLATE SPECIFICATIONS

How do we interpret an electric motor nameplate? Motor standards are established on a country by country basis.Fortunately though, the standards can be grouped into two major categories: NEMA and IEC (and its derivatives). In North America, the National Electric Manufacturers Association (NEMA) sets motor standards, including what should go on the nameplate (NEMA Standard MG 1-10.40 "Nameplate Marking for Medium Single-Phase and Polyphase Induction Motors").